CKS
In production · customer under NDA

A platform in production we can’t show you in full.

TotalConstruction Tech connects a general contractor’s operation from the first opportunity through closeout, as one modern system. We built it, and we hold an equity stake in the company behind it, not in the contractor using it. The first modules are in production with the customer and the rest are in active build. That’s most of what we can tell you, and the reason why is the interesting part.

Built on Neural Ops. Our agent platform plans, builds, reviews, and ships it, with senior engineers owning every call that matters.

design preview
Design preview of TotalConstruction Tech's pre-construction pipeline: opportunity cards grouped by stage, Lead, Targeted, Opportunity and Pre Bid, with search, stage and bid-due filters. The cards show placeholder data from the design file, not a customer's.
Design preview of TotalConstruction Tech's pre-construction pipeline board. Placeholder data from the design file, not a customer's.

At a glance

Our stake
Equity in TotalConstruction Tech
Industry
Commercial construction
Status
In production · active build
Disclosure
Limited by customer agreement
Built with
Neural Ops

What we can say

Construction runs on spreadsheets and twenty-year-old software, in tools that don’t talk to each other. The licensing is the small cost. The real one is re-keying, version drift, and decisions made on numbers that were already stale.

We’re replacing that with one platform covering the operation end to end, rebuilt on a modern stack rather than ported, with AI applied where it changes an outcome rather than where it demos well. It’s the largest thing we have in flight, and it runs on Neural Ops. That is how a team our size migrates an entire operating platform while the existing one stays live for real users.

Why the detail stops here

Holding a stake does not make the customer’s business ours to publish. It is their competitive advantage, not ours to spend. We don’t publish a customer’s name, data, roadmap, or numbers without written approval, and on this engagement we don’t have it. So you get an outline and a single design-file screen with placeholder data, and nothing that identifies them. That is exactly the treatment your project would get.

If you’d rather judge the work than the summary, look at BlueHelm: we own it outright, so we can show all of it, the screens, the release cadence, the honest limitations. Same team, same platform, same standard. And if a conversation gets far enough to need real references on the confidential work, we ask the customer and let them decide.

Stack

.NETReactNext.jsSQL ServerAzureClaude

Tell us the problem.

If your project doesn't look like anything on this page, that's the call. Tell us the problem and we'll tell you what's worth building, and what isn't.